Dan Milner, MD, MSc, MBA, Consultant Pathologist, ASCP
Multi-cancer early detection, with the promise of screening and/or diagnosing more than 50 cancers from a single, non-invasive patient sample, has implications that vary by geography and tool performance. In high-income countries with dense, complex cancer treatment systems, a near perfect MCED tool could lead to disruptive innovation, creative destruction, and massive downstaging of cancer in the population. In low-income countries where fragile, limited cancer treatment systems are evolving, a moderately performing MCED tool would lead to disruptive innovation and low-cost, global systems for screening and diagnosing patients with enormous impact on morbidity and mortality – importantly, creative destruction is irrelevant where these limited systems exist. Why there is such a massive difference in impact, the barriers that exist for both, and an ethical way forward will be discussed.