Recent advances in cancer immunotherapy have generated excitement across all fields of oncology. When working, immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive T-cell therapies create more sustainable results with less probability of recurrence than conventional or targeted cancer therapy. However, can we predict when it will work and do we know how to monitor patients’ response? Challenges in discovering predictive biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy are very significant and involve multiple cell types, multiple mechanisms of T-cell regulation, genetic heterogeneity of tumors, immune components, etc. Many industry and academia researches are fighting these odds right now, and they would benefit from a productive discussion and knowledge exchange. Cambridge Healthtech Institute’s Second Annual Diagnostics to Guide Cancer Immunotherapy conference is designed to bring together clinical immuno-oncologists, researchers from pharmaceutical, and biotech companies and members of the laboratory medicine community to discuss the underlying mechanisms of cancer immunotherapy, its predictive biomarkers as well as existing and emerging clinical assays aiming to improve patient outcomes.
SC4: Overcoming Challenges to Commercial Success in Molecular Diagnostics
SC10: Regulatory Compliance in Advanced Diagnostics
*Separate registration required
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24
10:30 am Registration
11:15 PLENARY KEYNOTE SESSION
12:50 pm Luncheon Presentation (Sponsorship Opportunity Available) or Enjoy Lunch on Your Own
1:25 Ice Cream and Cookie Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing
1:50 Chairperson’s Opening Remarks
Kenneth Emancipator, M.D., Executive Medical Director and Head, Companion Diagnostics, Merck Research Laboratories
2:00 Improving Immunotherapy for Cancer by Core Analysis
James L. Gulley, M.D., Ph.D., Chief, Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Director, Medical Oncology Service, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH
Immunotherapy has demonstrated rapid, deep, and durable responses across a wide array of different cancers. However these remarkable responses have only been seen in a small subset of patients. Combinations of agents that can initiate an immune response with agents that can render immune cells more functional within the tumor have the potential to further improve outcomes. However key to this is an understanding of immune regulatory influences within the tumor microenvironment.
2:45 The Immunoproteasome is a Key Regulator of Immune Evasion
Sam M. Hanash, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Antigen presentation by tumor cells is largely dependent on the immunoproteasome. Assessment of the status of the immunoproteasome may predict response or resistance to immunotherapeutic modalities.
3:30 A Cost-Effective GMP Platform for the Manufacture of Companion Diagnostic Proteins
Scott Waniger, Vice President, BioServices, Cell Culture Company
Manufacturing small quantities of GMP biologics for IVDs cost effectively is difficult. One solution is the use of a scalable, single-use perfusion bioreactor. In this presentation, a comparison of bioreactors for production of IVDs will be given. Data will be presented showing scalability and the ability to maintain steady-state production.
3:45 Circulating Stromal Cells for Immunotherapy
Daniel Adams, Senior Research Scientist, Creatv MicroTech Inc
Circulating Stromal cells and Circulating Tumor cells present in the blood of patients with solid tumors are easily isolated using CellSieveTM microfilters, useful for non-invasive sequential tumor monitoring. With the ability to stain >12 clinically relevant biomarkers, this technique is ideal for targeted drug analysis, combination immunotherapy and companion diagnostics.
4:00 Refreshment Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing
4:45 Determinants of Sensitivity and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockers in Cancer
Kurt A. Schalper, M.D./Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Pathology and Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, Director, Translational Immuno-oncology Laboratory, Yale Cancer Center
Immune checkpoint blockers have emerged as effective anti-cancer immunotherapy against various tumor types. Diverse studies have identified biomarkers associated with clinical benefit to these therapies. However, the clinical use of such tests is limited by their variable performance and restricted understanding of their biological significance. Here, we will discuss the current state and future landscape of immunotherapy biomarkers with focus in non-small cell lung cancer.
5:15 Precision Immunotherapy: The Challenge of Converting Complex Predictive Biomarkers into Practical Companion Diagnostics
Kenneth Emancipator, M.D., Executive Medical Director, Head of Companion Diagnostics, Merck Research Laboratories
Early immunotherapies have produced dramatic results for some patients, but future immunotherapies likely need to be guided by diagnostics to benefit more patients. Properly targeting immunotherapy requires incorporating into clinical practice complex diagnostics which can assess host immune response in addition to cancer biology itself. “Precision Immunotherapy” requires discovery of appropriate predictive biomarkers and incorporating them into practical companion diagnostics which will be adopted by practitioners.
5:45 PANEL DISCUSSION: Companion Diagnostics for Cancer Immunotherapy: Beyond PD-L1
Moderator:
Kenneth Emancipator, M.D., Executive Medical Director and Head, Companion Diagnostics, Merck Research Laboratories
James L. Gulley, M.D., Ph.D., Chief, Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, Director, Medical Oncology Service, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH
Kurt A. Schalper, M.D./Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Pathology and Medicine (Medical Oncology), Yale School of Medicine, Director, Translational Immuno-oncology Laboratory, Yale Cancer Center
- Latest advances in overcoming tumor-induced immune suppression and immune escape
- Standardization of existing assays and approaches
- Clinical trials for cancer immunotherapy: specific features and the role of diagnostics
6:15 Close of Day
6:00 Dinner Short Course Registration*
*Separate registration required
THURSDAY, AUGUST 25
7:30 Interactive Breakout Discussion Groups with Continental Breakfast
This session features various discussion groups that are led by a moderator/s who ensures focused conversations around the key issues listed. Attendees choose to join a specific group and the small, informal setting facilitates sharing of ideas and active networking. Continental breakfast is available for all participants.
PD-1/PD-L1 Assays and Beyond
Moderator: David L. Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Pathology, Yale University
- Heterogeneity of PD-L1
- Issues with antibody validation for PD-L1
- Domain specific PD-L1 antibodies
Immunoproteasome is a Key Regulator of Immune Evasion
Moderator: Sam M. Hanash, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
- Underexplored mechanisms of immune evasion eg metabolomics
- Non-T cell, non-antibody directed strategies for immunotherapy
- Novel approaches for predictive markers
8:25 Chairperson’s Remarks
David L. Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Pathology, Yale University
8:30 Companion Diagnostics for Cancer Immunotherapy
David L. Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Pathology, Yale University
Companion diagnostic testing for PD-1 axis immunotherapy has been a challenge. Multiple assays to test for the same variable (PD-L1) and other mechanisms for assessing the immunologic state of the tumor and its environment are all being tested. This session will discuss issues related to both PD-L1 assays and also discuss progress toward prediction of patient benefit from immune therapy, including assays that are not in the drug labels.
9:15 PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Luis Diaz, M.D., Associate Professor, Oncology & Cancer Biology, Johns Hopkins University
Somatic mutations have the potential to encode “non-self” immunogenic antigens. Tumors with a large number of somatic mutations due to mismatch-repair defects appear to be highly susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. This presentation will summarize the clinical and genomic data of using mutations as neoantigens.
10:00 Coffee Break in the Exhibit Hall with Poster Viewing
10:50 Epigenetic Priming for Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer
Pamela N. Munster, M.D., Professor, Medicine; Program Leader, Development Therapeutics; Director, Early Phase Clinical Trials’ Program, Helen Diller Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
A breakdown in immune tumor surveillance plays a crucial role in the development of metastatic cancer. Targeting the programmed death receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) have been major breakthroughs. In breast cancers however, particularly in hormone-driven breast cancer, immune responses are often absent. In reverse-translating clinical findings, from the patient to preclinical models, we show that epigenetic modulation leads to epigenetic immune priming and enhancement of immune response.
11:20 Cancer Neoantigens and Their Role as Predictive Biomarkers for Cancer Immunotherapy
Rajarsi Mandal, M.D.,Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Ultimately for the adaptive immune system to combat a cancer, it must recognize it as foreign. Pre-clinical work has suggested mutations in a tumor lead to the formation of neo-antigens (novel peptides) that the immune system recognizes as foreign. Increased mutational load in a number of malignancies has been associated with improved response to checkpoint blockade, suggesting that an increase in neo-antigens leads to a stronger likelihood of response. We will review mutational load and neo-antigen-based signatures as predictors of response to checkpoint blockade.
11:50 Immunosequencing: Generating a Potential New Class of Diagnostics
Catherine M. Sanders, MT, Ph.D, Director, Team Lead, Scientific Liaison, Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp.
Adaptive Biotechnologies’ immunosequencing technology combines bias-controlled multiplex PCR amplification with high-throughput sequencing and sophisticated bioinformatics. Adaptive’s immunoSEQ® Assays enable the accurate profiling of T cell and B cell receptor repertoires. In solid tumors, the immunoSEQ Assay accurately quantifies the density and clonality of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, with preclinical and clinical applications to inform repertoire changes in response to single agent or combination immunomodulatory therapies that have potential prognostic and predictive value.
12:20 pm Deciphering the Biology that Drives Response to Immunotherapy
Cliff Hoyt, Oncology Fellow, Director Lab Services and Applications, Quantitative Pathology, PerkinElmer
12:50 Luncheon Presentation (Sponsorship Opportunity Available) or Enjoy Lunch on Your Own
1:20 Session Break
2:00 Chairperson’s Remarks
Janis M. Taube, M.D., MSc, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
2:05 Hitting the Target: CAR T-Directed EGFRvIII in Glioblastoma
Jennifer Morrissette, Ph.D., Scientific Director, Clinical Cytogenetics Laboratory; Clinical Director, Center for Personalized Diagnostics (CPD), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
We initiated a pilot study of autologous T cells re-directed to the EGFR variant III mutation by means of a lentiviral vector encoding a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). GBM tumors were screened for the presence of the EGFRvIII mutation by a next-generation sequencing based assay with eligible patients enrolled in the study. NGS results of those patients who have had pre- and post-infusion studies will be discussed.
2:35 Combining PD-L1 Status with Additional Predictive Factors for Cancer Immunotherapy Response
Janis M. Taube, M.D., MSc, Director, Dermatopathology; Associate Professor, Dermatology and Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Immune resistance by tumor may have both adaptive and constitutive components, and both have mechanistic and biomarker implications. This talk will discuss our ongoing efforts to characterize further the local tumor microenvironment with the aim of improving patient selection and developing rational treatment combinations to overcome adaptive immune resistance.
3:05 Clinical Advances with Anti-PD-1 Inhibition and Combination Immunotherapy Strategies
Geoffrey T. Gibney, M.D., Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center
Recent immunotherapy developments targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have led to a new era in the management of patients with advanced malignancies. Combination regimens, such as concurrent anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 agents, have demonstrated even greater clinical activity than monotherapy, but convey a higher risk of severe immune toxicities. New combination strategies and biomarker research are expected to lead to personalized approaches. The current status of anti-PD-1 therapies will be reviewed.
3:35 PANEL DISCUSSION: Enabling Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Therapy
Moderator:
David L. Rimm, M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Pathology, Yale University
Panelists: Speakers of the Day
- Discover novel immune checkpoints as antibody targets for cancer immunotherapy
- Validate predictive biomarkers
- Design and validate clinical assay
4:05 Close of Conference